2022 Annual Report

I lāhui na‘auao Hawai‘i pono, I lāhui Hawai‘i pono na‘auao.

There will be a culturally enlightened Hawaiian nation,
There will be a Hawaiian nation enlightened.

Priority Recommendations for Native Hawaiian Education

Priority Funding Recommendations for Native Hawaiian Education

Assert Hawaiian language-medium instruction and culture-based education programs, frameworks, and values as principal in addressing equity, resiliency, and social-emotional well-being for increased Native Hawaiian learner outcomes and closing achievement gaps.

Expand ‘āina-based (land-based) programs and initiatives to address place-based inequities and increase educational opportunities.

Address mental health and social emotional well-being as essential for Native Hawaiian learner outcomes, increased academic performance, behavior, social integration, resiliency, identity, and self-efficacy.

Hand illustration of kukui leaves being sorted
Read more

Assert Hawaiian language-medium instruction and culture-based education programs, frameworks, and values as principal in addressing equity, resiliency, and social-emotional well-being for increased Native Hawaiian learner outcomes and closing achievement gaps.

The ability for a stabilized learning continuum and connection for Native Hawaiian communities to engage in cultural practices in a pandemic crisis of emerging COVID variants remains critical. This is critical to life as Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders (NHPI) have the highest death rates from COVID-19 compared with any other racial group (Hofschneider, 2020). This is also critical to healthcare access as NHPIs have the highest rate of COVID-19 cases compared to other racial and ethnic groups (UH News, 2020).

The pandemic put a historical context of disease population decimation of Native Hawaiians due to American imperialsim and its impact on loss of cultural practices, language, and land (NHEA, 2015). Ramifications of this—directly and indirectly—adversely affects long-standing mistrust of government institutions and increased vaccination hesitancy of NHPIs in the pandemic (UH News, 2022). To address this crisis, the Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander COVID-19 Response, Recovery, and Resilience Team was formed. This multi-agency team understood that culture-based programs and cultural belief systems and practices are powerful tools for helping Native Hawaiian communities make sense of and interpret the pandemic and its effects. For example, the team supported the creation of a Community-Based Subsistence Fishing Area to connect culturally-based practices, sustainable food systems, and public health benefits for NHPI communities (Kamaka, et al., 2021).

Native Hawaiians have strong connections to ‘āina (land, place), culture, and language and thus are socially and culturally impacted by the pandemic (Kaholokula, Samoa, Miyamoto, Palafox, & Daniels, 2020). Participants of NHEC’s 2022 community consultations reported a strong connection to culture and language in order to be successful. “Cultural programmig, values, learning ‘ōlelo Hawai‘i, ‘āina work is all so necessary,” reflected an O‘ahu participant, “and that’s not what I used to say, but this pandemic has completely changed my perspective.” (Native Hawaiian Education Council, 2022)

Priority funding for Hawaiian-language medium education and Hawaiian culture-based education programs in the next NHEP grant competition is paramount for supporting Native Hawaiian learner outcomes including resiliency and social-emotional well-being.

Expand ‘āina-based (land-based) programs and initiatives to address place-based inequities and increase educational opportunities.

Participants of NHEC’s community consultations shared experiences of food insecurity as stressors of the pandemic, which in turn underlines the incredible importance ‘āina-based learning or “teaching and learning through ‘āina so our people, communities, and lands thrive” (Ledward, 2013). Nationally, 21% of Native Hawaiian Pacific Islanders, as compared to non-Hispanic White counterparts (8%), experience food insecurity that directly and indirectly contribute to related factors such as increased healthcare costs, limited access to resources and income, and a correlation to poor physical health (Nguyen, Pham, Jackson, Ellison, & Sinclair, 2022).

Their relational value to food, to one another, and to the environment remains a priority for Native Hawaiian communities. A participant who attended NHEC’s community consultation session for “Out of School and ‘Āina” reflects on the importance of ‘āina-based programmming options in the community if traditional schools did not provide resources. “[Traditional schools] don’t see the rigor in ‘āina-based learning. I think that’s the disconnect. I think that’s why out-of-school programs are so important. It reminds our haumāna (students) that learning continues after the school bell rings”.

‘Āina-based learning as building relational value, connection, and identity between learners and the environment is in strong alignment with the goal of the Hawai‘i State Aloha + Challenge: by 2030, increase school-community sites that provide ‘āina-based education and stewardship opportunities for students to learn and experience ‘āina that “can deepen their relationship with the natural environment, cultivate connections within their communities, and build critical skills that can be applied to real-world issues” (Aloha+ Challenge Collective, n.d.).

The increased value of and access to ‘āina-based learning and education programs generated greater attention on Hawaiian-focused charter schools (HFCS), which have a long-established core pedagogy on cultivating purposeful and responsible relationships between learners and culture, language, and land (Rogers, Awo Chun, Keehne, & Houglum, 2020). The impact of the pandemic jolted urgent opportunity for HFCS and ‘āina-based programs to adapt hybrid and/or virtual delivery for whole family engagement to meet the needs of ‘āina learning and feeding communities. Hawaiian culture-based education principles are values-based, place-based, and land-based (Dragon Smith, 2020). A community participant that attended NHEC’s community consultation session for “K-12 and Higher Education” stated the need of ‘āina-based programming as an essential stabilizer in Native Hawaiian communities:

“If we don’t do something drastically different, we’re not going to have traditional farmers and fishermen. We’re going to have people who can code but not feed themselves in the next emergency. How do we create policy that supports the things that anchor our society?”

Priority funding for expansion and support of ‘āina-based programs reinforces the value of traditional wisdom in ‘āina as an educational approach to cultivate critical skills for learners, as well as an inclusive recovery approach for communities. NHEC strongly recommends ʻāina-based programming as a priority area for funding in the next NHEP grant competition.

Address mental health and social emotional well-being as essential for Native Hawaiian learner outcomes, increased academic performance, behavior, social integration, resiliency, identity, and self-efficacy.

Mental health and well-being are paramount for student academic achievement and life. The COVID-19 impacts of social and physical isolation, loss of routines, increased anxiety or pessimism of an unsure future impacted youth. At the onset of the pandemic in 2020, the Center for Disease Control reported a 24% increase in children’s mental-health related emergency room visits for youth ages 5-11, with a 31% increase for adolescents ages 12-17 (Leeb, et al., 2020).

The Council’s engagement with community through the 2022 consultations reaffirms that mental health issues among students are an important public health concern as everyone continues to emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic. Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) competencies in relation to student well-being continues to be reinforced as a priority by community. “Staff who are well-trained, experienced, and know how to deal with traumatized kids are essential,” stated a participant from a Moloka‘i community consultation. In NHEC’s 2017-2018 annual report, SEL recommendations were also provided to ED to consider for adoption as a new Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measure: “Hawaiian values and practices have served as guiding principles for Kānaka Maoli (term for indigenous people of Hawai‘i) for innumerable generations. Findings from this project show that the wisdom of the Hawaiian culture is expressed in values and practices that more recently have been identified as SEL competencies. This congruence between Hawaiian value systems and SEL principles reveal the possibility of identifying specific measures of student success that resonate with the Native Hawaiian community that simultaneously reflect the rigorous standards of GPRA.”

Priority and funding for programming that addresses increased mental health professionals in schools and communities including trauma-informed care training for all persons in contact with learners in the next NHEP grant competition is imperative to the mental health and well-being of Native Hawaiian learners.

Priority Recommendations for Native Hawaiian Education Program (NHEP) Grantee Support and Program Evaluation

Hand illustration of kukui leaves being weaved into hipu‘u lei

Support a culture of strategic investment in project evaluation and increase technical assistance for evaluation plan development.

Include a qualified program evaluator as a key team member for all NHEP grant projects and provide budgetary guidelines.

Commit to enhance grantee evaluation work through use of culturally responsive approaches to program evaluation.

Increase technical assistance and support to NHEP grantees.

Read more

Support a culture of strategic investment in project evaluation and increase technical assistance for evaluation plan development.

Prioritizing program evaluation funding and support goes beyond meeting grant requirements. Program evaluation is a critical and strategic investment in program management, decision-making, and ultimately, a key process for expanding services for community effectively. Although projects funded by NHEP are required to address program evaluation, the program does not have clear criteria for assessing the adequacy of evaluation plans, does not require grantees to use an independent evaluator or to submit evaluation reports, and does not provide guidance on how much grantees should invest in program evaluation.

The Council recommends that ED provide meaningful guidance and technical assitance to grant applicants/grantees on developing an evaluation plan for their program including what is expected of the evaluator/evaluation plan in alignment to the project logic model outcomes. NHEP grantees and evaluators work in diverse cultural, contextual, and complex communities—such as Native Hawaiian communities—in addressing the unique educational needs of students, parents, and teachers. As such, evaluation plans and needs may vary depending on the program design and delivery, balanced against budget and resource contraints. Setting NHEP grantees upon a solid foundation of support and resources for success ensures our collective work towards impactful change for Native Hawaiian communities and the program overall.

NHEC recognized that a kind of basic framework or guide for the evaluation of NHEP projects may be helpful, similar to the evaluation framework developed in 2011 for ED’s 21st Century Community Learning Centers grant program. A copy of the framework is provided under ‘Appendix A’.

Include a qualified program evaluator as a key team member for all NHEP grant projects and provide budgetary guidelines.

To better support grantees in developing stronger and more effective program evaluations, the Council recommends that NHEP grant projects include as a key member of their team a qualified program evaluator. The evaluator should have experience evaluating similar programs and be involved from the early development stages of the project to ensure that evaluation goals are built into project plans. Recognizing the value of participatory research and evaluation, NHEC recommends that the lead evaluator/researcher understands both the principles of participatory evaluation and making effective use of rigorous and objective data collection and analysis.

ED should also provide greater support and assitance to grant applicants/grantees in developing an evaluation budget to determine how much will be spent on evaluation tasks, or guidance on a minimum percentage of their program budget to devote to evaluation. In NHEC’s portfolio analysis of 2010-2018 NHEP grant awards, only 22 of the 38 grants indicated evaluation as a component of their project budgets, and overall these grantees spent less than 1% of funding on program evaluation (Native Hawaiian Education Council, 2018). In 2016, it was reported that only 12% of nonprofit organizations spent 5% of their budget on evaluation due to long-standing barriers of funding and staff time (Innovation Network, 2016). Additionally, the size of the grantee organization should be considered when providing budgetary guidelines as it is associated with the likelihood of working with an external evaluator. Almost half (49%) of large nonprofit organizations work with external evaluators compared to 14% of small nonprofit organizations, which are defined by the Internal Revenue Service as tax-exempt organizations that have $500,000 or less in total assets. Due to staff size and funding, small nonprofit organizations have less access to hire external evaluators (Morariu, Athanasiades, Pankaj, & Drodzicki, 2016).

Commit to enhance grantee evaluation work through use of culturally responsive approaches to program evaluation.

In building upon the new GPRA measure requiring grantees to develop program logic models to report against program outcomes, ED and the Office of Management and Budget holds a key opportunity in expanding culturally responsive approaches to evaluation that is respectful, equitable, and responsive to the communities impacted, while supporting improved effectiveness in cross-cultural settings for the overall program. Logic models help make connections in the work being done by the program and the desired changes the program wants to achieve, therefore culturally responsive evaluation is needed for effectively measuring success in desired change. In the aforementioned NHEP portfolio analysis, only three of the 73 grants that shared their project’s evaluation design indicated use of participatory approaches that involve stakeholders in design, implementation, and interpretation of the evaluation (Native Hawaiian Education Council, 2018).

The recommendation also aligns with NHEC’s 2018 study of the GPRA measures for NHEP. The study precipitated a long-stated need among NHEP grantees that GPRA standards were inadequate for measuring growth, learning, successes, and achievements of Native Hawaiian learners. The standards were largely considered culturally incongruent (Native Hawaiian Education Council, 2018). The new GPRA program logic model is a step in the right direction in identifying program-relevant outcomes, though more can be done to support and enhance measuring what matters to the Native Hawaiian community.

Increase technical assistance and support to NHEP grantees.

During the coaching and consultation sessions, grantees expressed their appreciation for receiving from ED individual review and feedback on their project logic model and for the technical assistance webinars provided this past year, and found great value in receiving individual, direct technical support through NHEC’s coaching and consultation sessions. However, along with wanting greater assistance with program evaluation planning and budgeting, grantees would like ED to provide individual review and feedback on annual performance reports (e.g., are they correctly responding to reporting requirements) and additional feedback on performance measurers immediately following approval of their project’s logic model.